KeyDrift
Free scan
← Leak scenarios

Mapbox tokens: pk. is fine — sk.eyJ never is

Only pk. tokens belong in browsers. sk. JWTs can create and delete tokens — account-level access. Free scan distinguishes.

3 min read

Two letters decide everything in Mapbox-land: pk (public) versus sk (secret) — and the secret ones are JWTs hiding behind dots.

What a Mapbox secret token is

pk. public tokens render maps client-side; sk. secret tokens manage the account incl. token lifecycle.

sk.eyJFAKE0000000000000000.FAKE0000000000000000

The prefix is the claim: scanners and attackers alike identify the format before they know anything else about it, which is why recognition starts at the first characters rather than the last.

What it grants

Account-tier operations:

  • Create/delete tokens.
  • Styles/datasets management per scopes.

How it ends up in a bundle

Three arrival routes cover nearly every case we see:

  1. Geocoding features importing admin tokens for convenience.
  2. Copy-paste from account settings instead of docs.

Does it belong in a browser?

pk. client-side with URL restrictions; sk. strictly server.

Rotate it

console.mapbox.com/account/access-tokens → delete exposed, issue replacements, update server consumers.

Find it in seconds

Open DevTools on the deployed site and search the built assets for sk\.eyJ. If the search hits, the credential shipped; if it does not, check the chunks loaded on authenticated or interactive views, not just the landing page — the calling code often sits behind a route.

Manual searching proves one page on one day. KeyDrift fetches the deployment the way a browser would, follows chunks named only in route manifests, reads streamed hydration payloads, and classifies what it finds — secret, or public-by-design — so an anon key never shows up dressed as an emergency.

Make sure it stays gone

One more thing worth knowing before you close the tab: fixing this once does not end the story. Agents imitate whatever pattern is already in the repo, templates carry their own defaults, and the next feature request can reintroduce the same shape of code. Continuous monitoring re-scans every deploy and alerts only on change — new, regressed, resolved — so the comeback attempt is a notification instead of a quarter-end surprise.

Why this keeps happening industry-wide

Zoom out and the pattern is bigger than one repo. AI-assisted output has outgrown review capacity everywhere at once, which means thousands of teams are making the same reasonable-looking tradeoffs in the same week. Nobody using modern tooling is uniquely exposed. The failure mode documented above is the modal outcome of velocity without verification, not evidence of carelessness.

How KeyDrift reports this exact finding

Report anatomy matters during incidents, so it is worth reading once calmly: masked string (never the live value — it ceases to exist outside the detection engine), salted fingerprint (trackable within your workspace, useless to strangers), chunk path (your starting point for a "git log -S" hunt), disposition (secret versus public-by-design), confidence (matches below 0.5 never reach the page at all).

Manual check, step by step

The full manual drill, for readers who want zero dependence on any tool: open the deployed site in a private window; launch DevTools → Sources; use Search-all-files (Ctrl/Cmd+Shift+F) for sk\.eyJ; then repeat for the other marker families — eyJ, sk_live_, sk-proj-, AKIA, postgres, BEGIN PRIVATE KEY. Decode anything JWT-shaped before reacting, and classify public-by-design formats as expected guests rather than intruders.

Close the loop with monitoring

If you take one operational step from this page, make it this: put the URL under continuous monitoring (free tier covers one project daily). The first scan tells you whether you have a problem today; the schedule tells you whether the problem comes back next month after someone re-adds the convenient line.

Common questions

URL-restricted pk_ enough?

For map rendering yes; geocoding-heavy apps sometimes need server relay anyway.

JWT-inside-prefix unusual?

Structural detection catches it — entropy plus shape; noted because it defeats naive prefix-only scanners.


Run a free scan at keydrift.dev/scan — paste a URL or the bundle source itself, no account. Findings arrive masked, with the exact chunk they live in.

Published by PostHat, KeyDrift’s content pipeline. Every factual claim is grounded in KeyDrift’s product documentation.